Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50942 (AP)

Mutyala Lakshmi Deepak v. Mutyala Bhuvaneswari

CRP/3152/2025 · 2025-11-20

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010610352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3152/2025 Between: 1. MUTYALA LAKSHMI DEEPAK,, S/O. MUTYALA VENKATA RAMA RAO, AGED 34 R/O. D.NO. 32-40/2-3/1, KARMIKA NAGAR, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUTYALA BHUVANESWARI, W/o. M. Lakshmi Deepak, D/o. Anjaiah, Aged 30, R/o. D.No. 8-239, Sri Datta Nilayam, Taara Nagar, Cherukuri Gardens, Tadigadapa Donka Road, Yanamalakuduru, Vijayawada- 520007. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe present Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed against non disposing off FCOP.No. 926 of 2023 on the file of Learned Principal Family Court Judge, Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copies of the docket orders 2 in FCOP. No. 926 of 2023 on the file of Learned Principal Family Court Judge, Vijayawada, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 The Court made the following: ORDER:- In this civil revision petition, the only limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petition filed by him seeking decree of divorce in F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2023 is not being disposed of expeditiously and sought direction to the trial Court to dispose of the same expeditiously. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Since the grievance of the petitioner is only to dispose of the F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2023 expeditiously as per the Case Flow Management in Subordinate Courts Rules, 2012, notice to respondent is dispensed with. 4. The petitioner is the husband and he has filed F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2023 seeking dissolution of marriage by way of passing of decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty against his wife. It was filed in the year 2023. The petitioner was examined as a witness and his examination-in-chief was recorded. But the matter has undergone about eleven (11) adjournments for a period of seven (07) months for cross-examination. Therefore, he seeks direction to the trial Court to dispose of the said divorce petition expeditiously. 5. As per the Case Flow Management in Subordinate Courts Rules, 2012, in Rule 3 pertaining to categorization of suits and other proceedings, sub- clause (b) covers divorce proceedings also and the said petition has to be disposed of within a period of 12 months from the date of appearance of the respondent therein. Since more than two years period has been expired after filing of the said petition and appearance of the respondent, still the petition is pending trial before the trial Court. 6. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Judge of Principal Family Court, Vijayawada, to make an 4 endeavour to dispose of F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2023 expeditiously, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 21.11.2025 ARR 5 98 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3152/2025 Date : 21.11.2025 ARR