APHC010448342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23122/2023 Between: 1. BEJJAM KRUPA,, W/O.LATE KALEBU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O.D.NO.25-26, GOLLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHIRALA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT (OLD PRAKASAM) ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SDSP, CHIRALA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT (OLD PRAKASAM) 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIRALA I TOWN POLICE STATION CHIRALA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT (OLD PRAKASAM) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23122 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not allowing the petitioner to enter into her house site property situated in an extent of 161 sq. yards in bearing Door No.4-4-7/2 in Town Survey No.5/2 Vijilipet in Chirala Town and Mandal of Bapatla District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner into the petitioner's house site property situated in an extent of 161 sq. yards in bearing Door No.4-4-7/2 in Town Survey No.5/2 Vijilipet in Chirala Town and Mandal of Bapatla District and pass….” 2. Heard Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police are not allowing the petitioner to enter into her house site property. He would further submit that the police are interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and one K. Mathaiah. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the respondent police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and some third parties. 3 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties except by following due process of law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23122 of 2023 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 642