1 APHC010001412021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 105/2021 Between: 1. KONDAPALLI RANGA REDDY,, S/O. SASTRULU REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 5-6, NANDIVADA VILLAGE, NANDIVADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, GUDIVADA RURAL CIRCLE, KRISNNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIVADA POLICE STATION, NANDIVADA. 5. A LAKSHMI NARASIMHAN, W/O. NARASIMHAN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. NO. 821, 4TH CROSS, SARAKKI ROAD, BANGALORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. M L ALI 2 The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 105 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not providing police aid for cultivation of my lands and the lands of the other farmers in Sy. No's 390, 391, 393, 392, 370, 371, 377, 379, 378, 400 in Nandivada Village, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District and not initiating necessary action on my complaints Dt. 18.11.2020 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and violative of provisions of Code criminal procedure, 1973 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to grant necessary police aid for my cultivation and initiate necessary action against the 5th respondent and her henchmen on the said complaints in the interest of justice and pass….” 2. Heard Sri K. Ratna Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition as and when required. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition as and when required. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. Vns