APHC010423182023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. MANGALAGIRI ROJA RAMANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. RUNNING MEE SEVA NET CAFE CENTER, DURGA BAZAR, ARILOVA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAHARANIPETA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in harassing the Petitioner by calling to the Police Station and asking him to sit from morning to evening at the Police Station and to settle the disputes with one Yenikapati Hanumantha Rao and his sons without any maunder of right, without any interest in respect of my poultry farm 'RK Poultry Farm' and with my property in an extent of 0.82 cents (0.33 cents, 0.22 cents, 0.311/4 cents) in Survey No.175/1, of Alavalapadu Village, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21741/2023 MANGALAGIRI ROJA RAMANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. RUNNING MEE SEVA NET CAFE CENTER, DURGA BAZAR, ARILOVA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAHARANIPETA POLICE STATION, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in harassing the Petitioner by calling to the Police Station and asking him to sit from morning to evening at the Police Station and to settle the disputes with one Yenikapati Hanumantha Rao and his sons right, without any interest in respect of my poultry farm 'RK Poultry Farm' and with my property in an extent of 0.82 cents (0.33 cents, 0.22 cents, 0.311/4 cents) in Survey No.175/1, of Alavalapadu Village, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MANGALAGIRI ROJA RAMANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. RUNNING MEE SEVA NET CAFE CENTER, DURGA ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAHARANIPETA POLICE STATION, ...RESPONDENT(S): India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in harassing the Petitioner by calling to the Police Station and asking him to sit from morning to evening at the Police Station and to settle the disputes with one Yenikapati Hanumantha Rao and his sons right, without any interest in respect of my poultry farm 'RK Poultry Farm' and with my property in an extent of 0.82 cents (0.33 cents, 0.22 cents, 0.311/4 cents) in Survey No.175/1, of Alavalapadu Village, J.Pangulur Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, besides in utter breach of violation of the Human Rights and as well as the personal liberty and limbs of the property of the Petitioner and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice and fair play and consequently direct the Respondents not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and harass the Petitioner, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and his police not to harass and call the Petitioner to the Police Station by interfering with the petitioners day to day activities of the business in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P A SESHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21741/2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in harassing the Petitioner by calling to the Police Station and asking him to sit from morning to evening at the Police Station and to settle the disputes with one Yenikapati Hanumantha Rao and his sons without any maunder of right, without any interest in respect of my poultry farm 'RK Poultry Farm' and with my property in an extent of 0.82 cents (0.33 cents, 0.22 cents, 0.311/4 cents) in Survey No.175/1, of Alavalapadu Village, J.Pangulur Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, besides in utter breach of violation of the Human Rights and as well as the personal liberty and limbs of the property of the Petitioner and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice and fair play and consequently direct the Respondents not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and harass the Petitioner, and pass...” 2. Heard Sri P.A.Seshu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that police are not calling the petitioner to the police station nor interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the parites except under due process of law. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without any reason. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 116 WRIT PETITION NO: 21741 of 2023 Dt.08.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.21741 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 08.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV