APHC010041402020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2449/2020 Between: 1. TAGGUPARTHI DADA KHALANDAR,, S/O BABULU, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, RIO KADARAMPALLI VILLAGE, RAYADURG MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALYANADURG TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. H SANTHI, D/O TIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O NEAR BC GOVINDAPPA STONE CRUSHER, MAREMPALLI, KALYANDURG TOWN, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT. 5. H RAMALA KRISHNAMMA, W/O TIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RIO NEAR BC GOVINDAPPA STONE CRUSHER, MAREMPALLI, KALYANDURG TOWN, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT. 6. H TIPPESWAMY, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RIO NEAR BC GOVINDAPPA STONE CRUSHER, MAREMPALLI, KALYANDURG TOWN, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the high handed action of the 3rd respondent in insisting the petitioner to marry the 4th respondent at the behest of the respondents 4-6 without any authority of law by using his 2 official power is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice” 2. Heard I.Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police are insisting him to marry respondent No.4. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil matter between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. The police are further directed to follow due process of law, in case any crime registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2449 of 2020 Dt.14.08.2025 Asr