Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50919 (KAR)

V S SATHYANARAYANA GUPTHA v. MUBARAQ

CRP/453/2022 · 2025-11-24

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48736 CRP No. 453 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. V S SATHYANARAYANA GUPTHA S/O V S SUBBARAYA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O BALAJI NAGAR, SIRA TOWN-572137 2. T P JAGADISH S/O T K PAPAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O BALAJI NAGAR, SIRA TOWN - 572 137 &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MUBARAQ S/O LATE BHEEMA JAN, W/O SABJAN SAB, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O BEGAM MOHALLA, SIRA TOWN-572137 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. ALTHAF HUSEN S/O S J MOHAMED HUSEN, AGE 51 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48736 CRP No. 453 of 2022 3. FAZLUR REHAMAN S/O JAFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 4. SHAHIZA BANU W/O LATE NAWAB SAB, AGE 50 YEARS, 5. REHAN S/O LATE NAWAB SAB, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 6. JEELAN S/O LATE JAFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 7. AYUB S/O LATE JAFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R2 TO R7 ARE R/O JAMIYA NAGAR, SIRA TOWN - 572 137 8. FAZIL AHAMAD S/O M G ABDUL AMEED, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O PARK MOHALLA, SIRA TOWN - 572 137 9. T J CHARAN S/O T P JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 10. V S NAGARAJ S/O V SUBBARAYA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48736 CRP No. 453 of 2022 RESPONDENTS NO.9 AND 10 ARE R/O BALAJI NAGARA, SIRA TOWN - 572 137 &RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2022 PASSED ON I.A.IV IN OS.NO.111/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SIRA. REJECTING THE IA NO.IV FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: "It is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court kindly be please dismiss the above petition as withdraw, in the interest of justice and equity." Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT-SG