Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50914 (AP)

RISHI COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14380/2023 · 2025-10-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.14380_2023 APHC010275782023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14380/2023 Between: 1. RISHI COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOLLAPANENICHANDRAMOULI @ K. CHANDRA MOULI, HINDU AGED 45 YEARS, S/O KOLLAPANENIRAMAKRISHNAIAH, D. NO.40-26-16, MYTRI STREET, SRI RAM NAGAR, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501. 3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501 4. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNERI, , MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501. 5. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER II, , MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not following the due process of law and not responding to the repeated representations given by the petitioner dt.18.04.2023 and 24.04.2023tothe 2nd respondent to remove the unauthorized cantilevers erected in the site 2 HN, J W.P.No.14380_2023 allotted for me for commercial advertisement by an order passed by the 2nd respondent with Roc.No.3908/2022/G2 Dt.29.03.2023 is as illegal, arbitrary and against to law and contrary to the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 300A by the constitution of India and direct the 2nd respondent to remove the unauthorized cantilevers erected at, 1 . Opp.Grand World, 2. Opp. Kalanajali, Renigunta Road, 3. Opp. Celekt Mobile Air-by pass Road and 4.Opp. Orient Inn Hotel Tirumala By-Pass Road and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2ndrespondent to remove the unauthorized cantilevers erected at 1. Opp.Grand World, 2. Opp. Kalanajali, Renigunta Road, 3. Opp. Celekt Mobile Air-by pass Road and 4.Opp. Orient Inn Hotel Tirumala By¬pass Road which is contrary to the order passed by the 2nd respondent with Roc.No.3908/2022/G2 Dt.29.03.2023and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to not to remove the authorized and licensed cantilevers erected at 1.0pp. Celekt Mobile, Air bypass Road, 2. Opp. Ramy Guest Line Hotel, 3. 0pp. Indian Oil Tirumala By-pas Road, 4. Opp. Orion Inn Tirumala Bypass Road, 5. Opp Kalanjali Renigunta Road & 6. Opp. Grand World Road without prior notice and without following due process of law, which is contrary to the order passed by the 2nd respondent with Roc.No.3908/2022/G2 Dt.29.03.2023 and permit me to restore the removed cantilevers Opp. Indian Oil Tirumala By-pas Road and Opp. Orion Inn, Tirumala Bypass Road, Tirupati and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. KALAVA SURESH KUMAR REDDY ( SC FOR MC RAYAL REGION, NELLORE) 3 HN, J W.P.No.14380_2023 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 06.10.2025 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.14380_2023 50 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.14380 of 2023 Date: 06.10.2025 NKA