APHC010363802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44955/2016 Between: 1. PINNEMSETTY VENKATA SATISH S/O RAMA RAO,, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 12-19-5/1, PRAKASHNAGAR,NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS, DIRECTOR, FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NEW DELHI. 2. UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS, DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NEW DELHI. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, ZONAL OFFICE, HYDERABAD ZONE, SHAKAR BHAVAN, BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD. 4. KAPIL CHITS KOSTA PVT LTD REP BY, ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO. 40-14-3/1, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD REP BY, ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 40-14-3/1, CHANDRAMOULI PURAM. NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, LABBIPET, VIAJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD ITS, DEBENTURE TRUSTEES, REP. BY ITS TRUSTEES, REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO. 3-1-188, 2 JS,J W.P.No.44955/2016 VIJAYA RAGHUNADAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in issuing the impugned letter dt. 26-10-2016 in refusing to entertain the complaint and the consequential letter of the ri respondent dt. 8-11-2016 insisting the petitioner to produce FIR to initiate proceedings under Money Laundering Act is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Money Laundering Act 2002 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith act on the complaint of the petitioner dt.25- 10-2015 without insisting for any FIR IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 55425 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents I to 3 to forthwith act on the complaint of the petitioner dt.25-10-2015 without insisting for any FIR pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 72653 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VARUN BYREDDY 2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D ) 3. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY 4. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI The Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.44955/2016 ORDER: As there was no representation for the petitioner on 07.10.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.11.2025 SR 4 JS,J W.P.No.44955/2016 175 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44955/2016 Dated: 04.11.2025 SR