Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50912 (AP)

KALLEPALLI SIVA SURYA PRASAD v. SMT.D.VIJAYA BHARATHI

CC/1786/2024 · 2025-10-28

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010119922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1786 OF 2024 Between: 1. KALLEPALLI SIVA SURYA PRASAD, S/O K. VENKATA RAO. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, ASST. AUDIT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR, STATE AUDIT, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTANAMS, TIRUPATHI. 2. B. MADHURIMA, W/O M. JAYA KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. ASST. AUDIT OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF THE STATE AUDIT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT D VIJAYA BHARATHI, W/o not Known to the Petitioners, Aged about 58 years. The Director of State Audit, Mangalagiri. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S A V RATNAM Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Smt. S.A.V. Ratnam, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioners (appearing through online) submits that the relief sought in the main Writ Petition itself was granted by the Respondents even before the Court adjudicated on the Writ Petition. Therefore, it is submitted, that the Writ Petitioner has withdrawn the Writ Petition. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioner does not intend to press the present Contempt Case also. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 29.10.2025 MNR 74 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO.1786 OF 2024 Dt: 29.10.2025 MNR