Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5091 (UTT)

EKANSH BANSAL v. UTTARAKHAND MEDICAL COUNCIL

WPMS/1060/2025 · 2025-04-16

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 1060 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shivanand Bhatt and Ms. Devika Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. On the previous date since the learned counsel for the respondent was not present and as such the matter was posted for today. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is a qualified doctor and doing private practice and is registered with the Uttarakhand Medical Council. He submits that the Uttarakhand Medical Council maintains a register as per Section 19 of Uttarakhand Medical Council Act, 2002, in which the details of the medical petitioners are entered. He further submits the petitioner has also an additional qualification of diploma in radiology and for entering this qualification in the register maintained by the Council, he already submitted a representation to the Uttarakhand Medical Council as per Rule 6 of Rules of 2004 on 30.10.2024 but the same has yet not been decided. The acknowledgement received with regard to that representation is also enclosed as Annexure-7. 5. Admittedly, the petitioner already submitted a representation as per Rule 6 of 2004 Rules and the same has yet not been decided. 6. If the representation has been submitted as per Rules, then the Uttarakhand Medical Council is under legal obligation to decide the said representation as per law. 7. Since, the representation is still pending for consideration before the Uttarakhand Medical Council, therefore, the Uttarakhand Medical Council is directed to decide the representation positively within two weeks from today in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order and if the authority is of the view that the opportunity of hearing should be given to the petitioner they may also give the proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 8. Subject to the observation and directions as above, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.04.2025 PR