Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50909 (AP)

GANGIREDLA VEERANNA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11822/2023 · 2025-11-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010225252023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11822/2023 Between: 1. GANGIREDLA VEERANNA, S/0 APPALNAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O 00, RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY, ANANDHAPURAM. MANDAL, GANGASANI AGRAHARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-531173. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYETI RAJ 85 RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO.135, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COLLECTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE TAHSIIDAR OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE GRAMA PANCHAYETI OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL REP BY ITS SECRETARY, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11822/2023 GANGIREDLA VEERANNA, S/0 APPALNAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O 00, RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY, ANANDHAPURAM. MANDAL, GANGASANI AGRAHARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA 531173. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYETI RAJ 85 RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO.135, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA THE COLLECTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA CTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE TAHSIIDAR OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE GRAMA PANCHAYETI RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY, VILLAGE OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL REP BY ITS SECRETARY, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI GANGIREDLA VEERANNA, S/0 APPALNAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O 00, RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY, ANANDHAPURAM. MANDAL, GANGASANI AGRAHARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYETI RAJ 85 RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO.135, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA THE COLLECTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA CTOR OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, THE TAHSIIDAR OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY, VILLAGE OF ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL REP BY ITS SECRETARY, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. YERRA DERNUDU EXPARTE, S/O APPALNAIDU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. RAMAVARAM PANCHYATHY-, ANANDHAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. R7 IS SET EX- PARTE AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.03.03.2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent authorities in not initiating any action against the encroachments over the government land which is classified as Porambhoku of extent Ac. 0.5 cents in survey No. 121 situated at Ramavaram Panchyathy, Anandhapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh despite the petitioner made representation Dated 25/10/2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 15, 16, 19, 21 and 300A of the Indian Constitution and Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent authorities to remove the encroachments in government land of extent Ac. 0.5 cents in Survey No. 121 situated at Ramavaram Panchyathy, Anandhapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh duly considering the representation dated 25/10/2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take steeps in stopping the illegal construction making without any valid permission on the government land of an extent of Ac. 0.5 cents in Survey No. 121 situated at Ramavaram Panchyathy, Anandhapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 25/10/2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the additional documents the copies of 1) Spandana Receipt, dated 20.03.2023, 2) Endorsement, dated 15.05.2023 and 3) Photos and pass order or orders by law, pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER This writ petition is filed questioning inaction of respondents in not taking action against the encroachments over the government land, classified as Poramboke, in an extent of Ac.0-05 cents in Survey No.121 of Ramavaram Panchayat, Anandhapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The respondent no.6-Panchayat Secretary, filed counter affidavit specifically stating at Para no.7 that the authorities have removed the illegal construction made by respondent no.7. 3. Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, admitted that pursuant to filing of the writ petition, encroachments made by respondent no.7 have been removed. 4. In view of the above, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same can be closed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Dated: 1st December, 2025. RR