B VENKATESWARA REDDY v. Sri Shashibhushan Kumar, I.A.S.,
CC/1652/2025 · 2025-11-04
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010325692025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1652 OF 2025 Between:
1. B VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/o Nagi Reddy, Aged about 55 years, R/o D no 220, Hussainapuram(V), Bethemcherla (M), Nandyala District-518598 ...Petitioner AND
1. Sri Shashibhushan Kumar I A S, Principal Secretary to Government Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. Sri Peeyush Kumar I A S, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District
3. Sri M Krishna Teja, The Commissioner R W S and S Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Office at Nakkal Road, Suryarao Peta, Vijayawada, NTR District.
4. Sri Ganiya Raj Kumari I A S, The District Collector RWS and S Nandyala, Nandyala District
5. Sri CH Manohar, The Executive Engineer, RWS and S P Division, Nandyala, Nandyala District
6. Sri P Ramesh Kumar Reddy, The Deputy Executive Engineer RWS and S, Sub-Division, Nandyala District, ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri P. Saraswathi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Komma Vijaya Raj Kumar, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the Respondents.
2. Sri P. Saraswathi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Komma Vijaya Raj Kumar, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner, on instructions, confirms the submission made by the learned Counsel for Respondents that the Order of this Court has been complied with and no further consideration in this Contempt Case is necessary. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No Order as to Costs.
3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.11.2025 JKS
3
56
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1652 OF 2025
05.11.2025
JKS
4