1 2025:CGHC:49633 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1518 of 2025 1 - Satish Kumar Kannoje S/o Late Shri Ganga Prasad Kannoje Aged About 59 Years (Wrongly Noted Satish Kannoje In Wps 8865/2025) R/o Ward No. 20, Civil Line, Khairagarh, Distt.- Khairagarh-Chuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Shri Manoj Kumar Pingua Ias Secretary, Administrative Department, State Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shri Rajesh Sukumar Toppo Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Water Resource Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Smita Jha, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06/10/2025 1. Case is listed in default for not filing the certified copy of the order. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 would submit that the order dated 31.07.2025 passed in WP (S) No. 8865/2025 which is subject matter of the contempt petition has been complied with. The representation submitted by the petitioner has been decided on 26.09.2025. 3. Learned counsel petitioner would submit that the decision has been taken only after the filing of the contempt petition. There was an order for deciding SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 the representation within a period of 02 weeks from the date of filing of the representation. The representation was filed on 04.08.2025, however, the decision has been take after a long time of filing of the representation. 4. Be that as it may, the contempt petition is filed raising a grievance that the order passed by this Court in WP (S) No. 8865/2025 dated 31.07.2025 has not been complied by the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy, 2025. Perusal of the copy of the recommendation dated 26.09.2025 made by the committee would show that the representation made by the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 31.07.2025 was considered and decided by the respondents/committee. 5. In view of the above, I do not find any good ground to continue this contempt petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey