A No.2391 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN A No.2391 of 2025 in C.S.No.135 of 2022 Meenakshi D/o Late N.Manickam, Granddaughter of Late Balammal, Old No.209, New No.239, KVB Thottam, Raja Annamalai puram, Chennai 28. and another Applicant(s) Vs M.Murali S/o late N.Manickam Granddaughter ofLate Balammal, Old No.209, New No.239, KVB Thottam, Raja Annamalai puram and 4 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.T.Jayaramaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Santhanaraman ORDER This application has been filed by the plaintiffs in Transfer C.S.No.135 of 2022 seeking permission to introduce further documents while tendering evidence in their status as defendants in T.O.S.No.3 of 2020. 1 A No.2391 of 2025 2. The evidence of the plaintiffs in T.O.S.No.3 of 2020 had been recorded in entirety. Now it is a turn of the defendants /plaintiffs in Transfer C.S.No.135 of 2025 to tender evidence. A string of documents have been appended to the Judges Summons and they include ten medical records, one report filed by the Tamilnadu State Commissioner for Women, one CSR issued by the Abiramapuram Police Station and a Marriage Registration Confirmation Letter. 3. The medical records would not advance the case to either prove the will or disprove the Will. They may be important documents viewed from the view point of the parties. But so far as the issues to be decided in the testimonial suit or in a civil suit are concerned, they may not be directly relevant. Similarly, report filed by the Tamilnadu State Commissioner for Women or the CSR issued by the Abiramapuram Police Station, again would not assist the Court either proving or disproving the Will. 4. One document which is a Marriage Registration Confirmation Letter, the learned counsel stats that in the Will, it had been mentioned that the granddaughters have already married but the marriage of one daughter 2 A No.2391 of 2025 took place after the execution of the Will. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents recorded objections and stated the documents will have to be marked subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility. 6. Any further objections can be raised during the cross examination of the witness, who produces this Marriage Registration Confirmation Letter dated 25.09.2024. This application is partly allowed restricting introduction of this one document viz., Marriage Registration confirmation letter dated 25.09.2024 and the original should be produced and marked during the course of examination of evidence. The other documents are not permitted to be marked. 30-06-2025 (½) vum 3 A No.2391 of 2025 C. V.KARTHIKEYAN,J., vum To 1. M.Murali S/o late N.Manickam Granddaughter ofLate Balammal, Old No.209, New No.239, KVB Thottam, Raja Annamalai puram 2. M.Palani (Deceased) S/o Late N.Manickam, Granddaughter of Late Balammal, Old No.209, New No.239, KVB Thottam, Raja Annamalai puram, 3. Mrs. P.Selvi W/o.Late M.Palani 4. Mr.P.Saravanan S/O. LATE M.PALANI bOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 10/3, MANAKULA VINAYAGAR STREET, CHENGAM ROAD, THIRUVANNAMALAI - 606 603. 5. Mrs. P.Saranya, W/o. M. Karthik No.39/17, Gandhi Nagar, Krishnagiri - 635 001. A No.2391 of 2025 in C.S.No.135 of 2022 30.06.2025 4