1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6883 of 2025 1 - Deepak Dewangan Son Of Khageshram Dewangan Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Ward No.02, Bhawarpur, Chowki Bhawarpur, Tehsil Basna, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Basna. District- Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. N. K. Chatterjeet, Advocate. For Non-applicant(s) : Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 25/09//2025 1. Pursuant to the order dated 23.09.2025 the victim appeared through virtual mode from DLSA, Mahasamund and raised objection in granting bail to the applicant, her objection is taken on record. 2. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 22.04.2025 in connection with Crime No. 167/2025 registered at Police Station Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence under Sections 375(2)(N), 377, 506(B), 509(B) of IPC and Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 67, 67-A, 67-B of the Information Technology Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on 22.04.2025, the report has been registered against the applicant on the complaint made by the complainant with the allegation that the applicant who is married person had entered into ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.10.06 18:28:57 +0530 2 the house and committed rape upon her and while committing rape upon her he prepared obscene video and by threatening to upload in the whatsapp and instagram, he repeatedly committed rape upon her many times and ultimately get the obscene video viral on the mobile phone. On the report made by the complainant the offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 377, 506(B), 509(B) of IPC, Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 67, 67-A, 67-B of the Information Technology Act has been registered in which the applicant has been arrested on 22.04.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is falsely implicated in the offence. There is no evidence that the applicant has uploaded the obscene video of the victim. it is only on the suspicion and complaint has been made by the complainant under the pressure of her parents. The applicant is in jail since 22.04.2025, and final adjudication of the case will take its own time, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes and submitted that there is sufficient evidence in the charge-sheet that the applicant has uploaded the obscene video of the victim, he committed rape upon her and get the obscene video prepared which was uploaded in the whatsapp and instagram, therefore, the applicant is not entitled for bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, considering the nature of allegation and the material collected during investigation further considering the gravity of the offence as well as the statement of the under Section 183 of BNSS, 2023 of the victim, I am not inclined to released the applicant on bail, his bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok