118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA National Highways Authority Rajvinder Singh & Ors CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed 08.04.2025 passed by application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitratio has been allowed and operation of the award stayed till disposal of objection deposit of entire enhanced petitioner within two months land owners and the remaining is to be kept in 2. Learned counsel has referred to 20.03.2025, rendered by Lal and others v. issued vide order dated 29.04.2025. down, even execution petition IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2780-2025 Date of Decision :07.05.2025 National Highways Authority of India Versus Singh & Ors HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed for .04.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Patiala application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitratio has been allowed and operation of the award stayed till disposal of objection petition under Section 34 of the Act deposit of entire enhanced awarded amount alongwith requisite interest within two months, out of which fifty per cent land owners and the remaining is to be kept in the Learned counsel has referred to rendered by a Division Bench in CWP v. Union of India and others, and the subsequent clarification issued vide order dated 29.04.2025. He contends that in view of execution petition to enforce the award IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Date of Decision :07.05.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioner. setting aside the order, dated Additional District Judge, Patiala, whereby application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been allowed and operation of the award, dated 15.03.2022, has been petition under Section 34 of the Act, subject to amount alongwith requisite interest by the fifty per cent is to be released to the the shape of FDR. Learned counsel has referred to a recent judgment, dated n Bench in CWP-19799-2023 titled Sohan and the subsequent clarification contends that in view of the law laid to enforce the award is not maintainable. dated whereby , has been subject to by the is to be released to the , dated Sohan and the subsequent clarification law laid PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.09 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2780-2025 3. It however never raised before available. 4. In view thereof, t petitioner to approach pleas as raised in the instant petition. petitioner will be decided in accordanc May 07, 2025 ps -2- however remains undisputed that t never raised before learned Additional District Judge In view thereof, the petition is disposed of approach learned Additional District Judge, Patiala pleas as raised in the instant petition. The applica petitioner will be decided in accordance with law. May 07, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable remains undisputed that the issue raised herein was Additional District Judge as the judgment was not he petition is disposed of granting liberty to the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, taking all the The application, if any, filed by the ith law. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No he issue raised herein was udgment was not liberty to the ing all the tion, if any, filed by the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.09 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document