Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50875 (KAR)

SMT LAKSHMAMMA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/37549/2025 · 2025-12-19

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54533 WP No. 37549 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.37549 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HALUVAGILU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573116. &PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJARAMA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER9S OFFICE BUILDING, HASSAN-573116. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT-2 OFFICE AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER9S OFFICE BUILDING, HASSAN-573116. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.R.D.C.L. HOLENARASIPURA ROAD EXTENSION, HASSAN DISTRICT-573116. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAJKUMAR M., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND TO DISPOSE OF THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54533 WP No. 37549 of 2025 PETITIONER DATED 21.10.2022, FILED UNDER SECTION 28(A)(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the application dated 21.10.2022 filed under Section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (8LA Act, 18949 for short) which is stated to be pending without consideration for a considerable period of time. Brief facts: 3. The petitioner is the absolute owner of the land bearing Survey No.102/2 measuring 0.14 guntas situated Haluvagilu Village, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54533 WP No. 37549 of 2025 District. The said land was acquired by the respondents for the purpose of formation of a ring road pursuant to notifications issued under Sections 4 (1) and 6 (1) of the LA Act, 1894, followed by passing of an award. 4. Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded, the petitioner submitted an application under Section 28A (1) of the LA Act, 1894 on 21.10.2022, seeking re-determination of compensation on basis of an award passed by a Civil Court in respect of a similarly situated lands. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application filed under Section 28A(1) of the LA Act, 1894 on 21.10.2022 is still pending before respondent No.2 without any order being passed and that the respondents be directed to consider her application in accordance with law. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the filing of application dated 21.10.2022 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54533 WP No. 37549 of 2025 under Section 28A (1) of the LA Act, 1894 and submits that the same would be considered in accordance with law and compliance with the statutory requirements. 7. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the material placed on record, it is not in dispute that the petitioner has filed an application dated 21.10.2022 under Section 28A (1) of the LA Act, 1894 seeking re-determination of compensation. The grievance of the petitioner is confined to non- consideration of the said application for a considerable length of time. This Court is of the view that when a statutory application is pending before the competent authority, the SLAO is statutorily bound to consider it within a reasonable time in accordance with law. 8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to issue a limited direction to the respondents - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54533 WP No. 37549 of 2025 to consider and dispose of the application filed by the petitioner. Accordingly, this Court pass the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is disposed of. ii. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's application dated 21.10.2022 filed under Section 28A (1) of the LA Act, 1894 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12