APHC010763682012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39437/2012 Between: 1. T.RAMANARAYANA REDDY,, S/O. T.BAKTAVATSAL REDDY, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. B-27, S.V. PURAM, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, ANANTAPUR, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE VICECHANCELLOR, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR 3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the proceedings No. SKU/Estt./E1/ Engg/2012, Dt.14- 12-2012 is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 50087 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No. SKU/Estt./E1/ Engg/2012, Dt.14-12-2012 with further direction to the Respondents to continue the Petitioner as Superintending Engineer (Electrical) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR SC For S K UNIVERSITY 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 14.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 61 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.39437 OF 2012 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN