Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50854 (ALL)

DR. RAJ KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/56660/2017 · 2025-05-15

Donadi Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81784 Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 56660 of 2017 Petitioner :- Dr. Raj Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Dwivedi,Man Mohan Singh,Ram Gopal Tripathi,Roopesh Tewari,Shailendra(Senior Adv.),Utsav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Chandan Sharma,Neeraj Tripathi(Senior Adv.),Rijwan Ali Akhtar Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. Heard Sri Shailendra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. After hearing learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, this Court has passed the following orders on 1.5.2025: "1. After elaborate hearing, Sri Akakshya Pratap holding brief of Sri Chandan Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents has sought time to discuss with the authorities to revisit the orders as directed by this Court in Writ-A No.3734 of 2009. 2. List this matter once again on 16.05.2025 for further hearing." 3. Sri Akakshya Pratap, holding brief of Sri Chandan Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-University, on instructions has submitted that the authorities are intending to revisit the issue by strictly by taking observations made by this Court in Writ A Nos. 3734 of 2009 and 47375 of 2016. 4. Though, learned Senior Counsel has objected as the respondents everytime passing one or another order without taking into consideration the observations made by this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-University on instructions, has submitted that the authorities would consider the case of the petitioner only based on the observations made by this Court in the above stated writ petitions. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-University, the writ petition is disposed of. The impugned communication of Registrar of the University dated 10th August, 2017, report of the sub committee dated 10th April, 2017 and approval of the Executive Council dated 28th April, 2017 are quashed and the matter is remitted back to the respondents to revisit the issue as per the orders passed in Writ A Nos. 3734 of 2009 and 47375 of 2016 and pass appropriate orders after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Noman (Donadi Ramesh, J.) Digitally signed by :- NOMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- NOMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad