Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040017132023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/606/2023 M/s Marpi Wire Products represented by its Proprietor Shri Tummar Bagra, S/o Lt. Kartum Bagra, R/o Aalo, P.O/P.S Aalo, District West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. Contact 919383290994 VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Others Represented by the Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Eastern Zone Rural Works Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Pasighat. 3:The Superintendent Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Ruaral Works Circle East Siang District Government of Arunachal Pradesh cum Chairman Tender Evaluation Board 4:The Executive Engineer cum PIU Age: 0 Occupation : Likabali Division Rural Works Department East Siang District Government of Arunachal Pradesh cum Member Secretary Tender Evaluation Board 5:The Divisional Accountant Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Likabali cum Member Tender Evaluation Board Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Extra Assistant Commissioner/circle Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Oyan East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh cum Member Tender Evaluation Board. 7:M/s I.T Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : Represented by its Proprietor Nonngam Wangsu having its registered office at Village Kangku P.O/P.S Likabali District Lower Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 8:M/s Sunwin Energy and Infra Pvt. Ltd. Age: 0 Occupation : Represented by its Director Shri Praveen Sharma and Shri Naveen Hemani having its registered office at 3rd Floor Balaji Point Athagaon Opp-Marwadi Hospital Guwahati Kamrup Assam-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : Tsering Gyatso, T Rahul,N Kanu,Tame Rimi,K Gara,M Tunar,Bomyom Ori,N Rama,Uttam Deka,Chorpok Modi,Dejum Tally,Tonni Gammi,Tanur Gao,Amy Talom,Kangge Taggu,Tumba Ango,Adam Tatak Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC(RWD) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 25.09.2025 Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner, who fairly submits that the matter has become infructuous in view of the completion of the work, for which Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD has placed work completion report on record. On perusal of the completion report dated 23.09.2025 placed by the learned Standing Counsel, it appears that the work in question, appears to have been completed on 20.09.2025 by the firm M/s IT Enterprises, respondent No. 7 herein, in all respects and the petitioner having not prayed for any other relief except the challenge to the rejection of the technical bid, as fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. It is needless to observe that the EMD of the petitioner be released to the petitioner. The copy of the completion report dated 23.09.2025, showing completion of the work in all respect by the respondent No.7 on 20.09.2025 is kept on record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant