1 2025:CGHC:55026-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5906 of 2025 Madhusudan Agrawal Project Private Limited Having Its Office At Ground Floor, Plot No. 10/11- 16/17, Jhajharia Kunj, Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Through Its Managing Director Madhusudan Agrawal S/o Shree Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Jhajharia Kunj, Narmada Nagar, Police Station - Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Chief Engineer Office Of The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, National Highway Zone, N.H. Campus, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Regional Officer Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, N.H. Campus, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department, N.H. Circle, Pwd, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. The Executive Engineer Public Work Department, N.H. Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1/ State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.11.13 10:27:45 +0530 2 For Respondents No. 2 to 5 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 12/11/2025 1. Heard Mr. Mahendra Dubey, counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondent No. 1/ state and Ms. Anmol Sharma, C.G.C. for respondents No. 2 to 5. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction quashing the impugned letter/Memorandum dated 28/10/2025 (ANNEXURE-P/3) as well the Meeting Notice dated 29/10/2025 (ANNEXURE-P/4) issued by Respondent no. 2 to the extent it declares the Petitioner to be "non-responsive" and may kindly further be pleased to direct the Respondent no. 2 to verify the submission/uploading of the Class-I Local Supplier Certificate and the Land Border Certificate from the Petitioner's bid documents and re-evaluate the Petitioner's technical responsiveness, allowing the Petitioner to participate in the tender process from the stage of evaluation of technical bid and further allow the Petitioner to participate in financial bid if found technically responsive after the due process of technical evaluation. 3 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other order which may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances.” 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and, therefore, seeks permission of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the present petition. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti