Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010347172025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1734/2025 Between:
1. KORNI VENKATARAMANA, W/O KORNI BALAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION VILLAGE ORGANISATION ASSISTANT (VOA), RAVAVVARAMGRAMA SANGHAM, D.NO. 3- 003, MAIN ROAD, PATHAREDDYPALEM, PUTCHANUTHALA, NUZENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN 522660. ...PETITIONER AND
1. K HEERA LAL, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DRDA) VELUGU, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPETA. 2. N RAMANJENUYULU, THE ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER, DRDA, YSR KRANTHI PATHAMVELUGU, NUZENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. B YEDUKONDALU, THE CLUSTER CO-ORDINATOR, DRDA, KOTHA REDDYPALEM VILLAGE AND POST, NUZENDIA, NUZENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnors/Respondents no. 4, 5 and 7 in the W.P No.30407 of 2024 for gross, deliberate and willful violation of the final order
2
dated 21.12.2024 in W.P No. 30407 of 2024 on the file of the Honble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
Heard Smt. Ayesha Azma.S, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hari Babu Maguluri, learned Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 21.12.2024 in W.P.No.30407 of 2024. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents 4 to 7 in the writ petition, in not allowing the petitioner to discharge her duties as Village Organisation Assistant (VOA) in Lakshmipuram Grama Samaikya Sangam of Lakshmipuram Village, Nuzendla Mandal, Palnadu District. 4. The writ petition was disposed of, directing the respondents 4 to 7 not to interfere with the petitioner’s discharge duties as Village Organisation Assistant (VOA) in Lakshmipuram Grama Samaikya Sangam of Lakshmipuram Village, Nuzendla Mandal, Palnadu District. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was specifically pleaded that the respondents are interfering with the petitioner in discharging duties as Village Organisation Assistant. 6. The 2nd respondent filed the counter-affidavit.
Along with the counter- affidavit, a resolution dated 09.11.2024 of Lakshmipuram Grama Samaikya Sangam was annexed. A perusal of the resolution discloses that the petitioner
3
was removed as Village Organisation Assistant of the Samaikya and that the members of the Samaikya elected Smt. S.Bharathi as Village Organisation Assistant. 7. Thus, as seen from the resolution dated 09.11.2024, it is evident that the petitioner has not been discharging duties as Village Organisation Assistant and that Smt. S.Bharathi has been appointed in her place. 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any violation of the order. [
10. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 20.12.2025 SNI
4
223 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1734 / 2025
Date: 20.12.2025 SNI