103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Baljit Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, respondents no.4 to 8 not to harass and threaten the family members to compromise the matter and vacate the land under possession at the behest of respondent n 2. Learned State counsel has filed a status report dated 14.05.2025 which is taken on record. Based upon this, he contends that the matter regarding possession over the property in dispute is Court. However DDR no.12 under Section 164 of BNSS and DDR no.08 under Sections 126 and 170 of BNSS, preventive action was taken against both the parties refers to an order Payal, which shows possession of the disputed land in the presence of the Deputy Superintendent of Police photography of the harvesting IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22940 Date of Decision :19.05.2025 Versus of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Sunny Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed, inter alia, respondents no.4 to 8 not to harass and threaten the family members to compromise the matter and vacate the land under at the behest of respondent no.15/local MLA. Learned State counsel has filed a status report dated 14.05.2025 which is taken on record. Based upon this, he contends that the matter regarding possession over the property in dispute is Court. However, due to an apprehension of breach of DDR no.12 under Section 164 of BNSS and DDR no.08 under Sections 126 and preventive action was taken against both the parties refers to an order, dated 06.05.2025, passed by the Sub shows that a Receiver has been appointed, who shall take possession of the disputed land, and shall also get the standing crop in the presence of the Deputy Superintendent of Police photography of the harvesting process shall be made and proceeds of the crop IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 22940-2025 Date of Decision :19.05.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. inter alia, seeking a direction to respondents no.4 to 8 not to harass and threaten the present petitioner and his family members to compromise the matter and vacate the land under his o.15/local MLA. Learned State counsel has filed a status report dated 14.05.2025, which is taken on record. Based upon this, he contends that the matter regarding possession over the property in dispute is sub judice before the Civil of breach of peace, by recording DDR no.12 under Section 164 of BNSS and DDR no.08 under Sections 126 and preventive action was taken against both the parties. He also passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, has been appointed, who shall take get the standing crop harvested in the presence of the Deputy Superintendent of Police. Videography and shall be made and proceeds of the crop direction to petitioner and his his , which is taken on record. Based upon this, he contends that the matter before the Civil by recording DDR no.12 under Section 164 of BNSS and DDR no.08 under Sections 126 and He also Divisional Magistrate, has been appointed, who shall take harvested aphy and PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.23 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-22940- shall be deposited in a newly remain in custody of Court. Learned to the petitioner’s life and liberty regard, he has referred to paragraph no.7 of the That as regards the allegation of threat to life and liberty as raised by the petitioner at present there is no such threat to his life and liberty. The local police remain vigilant and continue to monitor the situation on any person to endanger the life or liberty of the petitioner or the peace, appropriate legal action shall be taken forthwith in accordance with law 3. In view of the facts aforementioned, issued in the matter, as the dispute between the parties regarding the land in question is sub judice maintain peace have already been initiated by apparent from the order dated 06.05.2025. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order with law. May 19, 2025 ps -2025 -2- shall be deposited in a newly opened Bank account. The remain in custody of the Receiver till the final decision Learned State counsel has also disputed petitioner’s life and liberty as the same have been f e has referred to paragraph no.7 of the That as regards the allegation of threat to life and liberty as raised by the petitioner at present there is no such threat to his life and liberty. The local police remain vigilant and continue to monitor the situation on the ground In case any fresh attempt is made by any person to endanger the life or liberty of the petitioner or the peace, appropriate legal action shall be taken forthwith in accordance with law. In view of the facts aforementioned, in the matter, as the dispute between the parties regarding the land in sub judice before a Civil Court, and appropriate proceedings have already been initiated by the apparent from the order dated 06.05.2025. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order, dated 06.05.2025, if so advised May 19, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable ank account. The land in dispute shall final decision is rendered by the Civil the allegations regarding threat have been found not true. In this e has referred to paragraph no.7 of the status report which is as under: That as regards the allegation of threat to life and liberty as raised by the petitioner at present there is no such threat to his life and liberty. The local police remain vigilant and continue to monitor the ground In case any fresh attempt is made by any person to endanger the life or liberty of the petitioner or breach the peace, appropriate legal action shall be taken forthwith in In view of the facts aforementioned, no direction is required to be in the matter, as the dispute between the parties regarding the land in and appropriate proceedings to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, as Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the dated 06.05.2025, if so advised, in accordance (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No land in dispute shall s rendered by the Civil the allegations regarding threat n this That as regards the allegation of threat to life and liberty as raised by the petitioner at present there is no such threat to his life and liberty. The local police remain vigilant and continue to monitor the ground In case any fresh attempt is made by breach the peace, appropriate legal action shall be taken forthwith in n is required to be in the matter, as the dispute between the parties regarding the land in to , as Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the , in accordance TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.23 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document