2025:KER:29816 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 413 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.01.2025 IN MAT.APPEAL NO.1096 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN MAT APPEAL: PRIYA ABRAHAM, AGED 39 YEARS, D/O. ANNIE THOMAS KONNACKAL HOUSE, TC 4/2239-29, B-7, KRISHNA NAGAR, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ABRAHAM JACOB, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O LATE K.C.JACOB, KONNACKAL HOUSE, TC 4/2239-29, B-7, KRISHNA NAGAR, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695004 BY ADV V.PHILIP MATHEWS RESPONDENT/APPELLANT IN MAT APPEAL: NAVIN SKARIA, AGED 44, S/O. SKARIA MARANGATTU HOUSE VAKATHANAM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686538 BY ADVS. SMRUTHI SASIDHARAN AADIL MUBARAK U.A.(K/4300/2024) BRIJESH N.B.(K/001226/2024) ASWATHY AMBY(K/002062/2022) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:29816 RP 413/2025 2 O R D E R Devan Ramachandran, J. This petition, seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 22.01.2025, has been filed by the petitioner alleging that the child is unwilling to go to the father, or to even talk to him, in terms of the directions in the judgment. 2. We are afraid that this is not a ground that can be impelled for review because, we had made it clear that the interaction of the father with the child is subject to the consent of the latter. Therefore, we see no reason to interfere at this stage any more. Consequently, this Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE RR