Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50828 (CHH)

DANIEAL RAJU RAVIDI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3058/2025 · 2025-10-07

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50109 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3058 of 2025 Danieal Raju Ravidi S/o Pushparaj Ravidi Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Bejangiwada, Christian Mohalla, Post Bejangiwada P.S. Kalimela, District- Malkangiri- Orissa ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Puspaal, District- Sukma (C.G.) ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 08.10.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.02.2025 passed in MCRC No. 1128 of 2025, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Danieal Raju Ravidi, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), South Bastar Dantewada KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 District-South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 04.08.2025 has requested for grant of one month’s time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that in the present case, the hearing commenced for the first time on 08/04/2025, upon the assumption of charge by the current Presiding Officer. The evidence of all the witnesses have been duly recorded. The case has been fixed for examination of the accused on 12/08/2025, for which additional time is required. Due to this reason, it has not been possible to dispose of the case within the prescribed time limit. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that a further period of one month may kindly be granted for the disposal of the case. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal