Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50825 (AP)

MARLAPTI SIVA RANJANI v. THE STATE OF AP

WA/956/2025 · 2025-10-05

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010422672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Ba r MONDAY,the SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL Nos. 956 AND 990 OF 2025 / WRIT APPEAL NO: 956 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 24.06.2025 in W.P. No. 14845 of 2025 on the file of High Court. Between: 1. Marlapati Siva Ranjani, W/o. Davala Chandra Babu, aged about 44 years. R/o. D.No.54-2-938, Sail Nilayam, Opp. Sims College Road, 3'^'^ Lane, Padmavathi Nagar, Guntur. Guntur District, A.P. 2. Ghanta Sharmila, D/o. G. Kasi Viswanadha Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o. D.No.82-5-936, Parvathipurarn. 2"^ Lane, Opp. Tirupathamma Temple Lane, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. I 3. Eerapani Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Dasari Penumaka Anil Kumar, aged about 44 years R/o. D.No.36-25-1483, % Lane, Sanjeevaiah Nagar, Near Church, Guntur. Guntur District, A.P. 4. Madasu Mahalakshmi, W/o. Devarapalli Raveendra, aged about 58 years, R/o. D. N0.11-232B, Patha Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P. 5. Thalluri Lakshmi, W/o. Mohan Rao, aged about 46 years, R/o. D.No.26-44-97/1.4th Lane, A.T. Agraharam, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. ' 6. Penna Madhavi Latha, W/o. M. Koteswara Rao, aged about 51 years, R/o. D. No. 16-5-213, Lane, Balaji Nagar, Old Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 7. Chitithoti Swarna Latha, C/o. Ch. Samuel Anil Kumar, aged about 45 years R/o. D.No.7-17-498, Gopala Krishna Colony, 1®* Lane, Near Postal Colony, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. I 8. Rayapati Sarala Kumari, C/o. J. Nagaraju, aged about 44 years, R/o. Flat No.502, Srinivasa Nilayam, Beside Arka College, Reddypalem Road Down, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 9. Putia Swapna, C/o. Yanamadala Rajesh, aged about 44 years, R/o. D.No.6-14-1, 14/3 Lane, Arundelpet, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 10. Ganapavarapu Lalitha Devi, C/o. J. Sundara Rao, aged about 47 years, R/o, D.No.26-20-9, Gayathri Nilayam, 5'^ Lane, A.T. Agraharam, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 11. Boppudi Lima Devi, W/o. Stanley Raja Kumar, aged about 56 years, R/o. D.No.26-14-19, Raghuram Nagar, Nagarampalem, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 12. Konda Srilakshmi, W/o. M. Kishore Babu Reddy, aged about 49 years R/o. D. No. 7-6-929, Rasool Nagar, 2^'^ Lane, Near Arch Centre, Sarada Colony, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 13. Manne Suneetha, W/o. Rambabu, aged about 48 years, R/o. D.No.1-34-277, 3^^^ Lane, Satyanarayana Puram, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 14. Thummapudi Madhavi, W/o. U. Giri Srinivasa Rao, aged about 52 years, R/o. 1®‘ Lane, Aditya Nagar, Sai Baba Temple Lane, Reddypalem Road, Pedakakani, Guntur District, A.P. (Appellants herein are arrayed as Petitioners No.1,2, 4, 5, 8 14 to 22 in W.P. No.14845/2025) ...Appellants And 1, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. I 2. The Commissioner of Health and Family Welfare Government of Andhra Pradesh, • 5"' Floor, APIIC Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P. 3. The Director of Medical Education, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Hanumanpet, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District, A.P. 4. The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District, A.P. 5. The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services, Zone-Ill, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. Respondents/Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of interim order dated 24.06.2025 in W.P.No. 14845/2025, until disposal of the main Writ Appeal. in Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR SERVICES I APHC010436392025 &.i<H WRIT APPEAL NO: 990 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 24.06.2025 in W.P. No. 1 5299 of 2025 on the file of High Court. Between: Chituvuri Kiranmai, W/o. Bhaskar, aged about 51 years, Occ; Nursing Superintendent Grade-1, R/o. D.No.2-105, Near Poleramma Temple Teja Public School Road, Gorantia, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. ...PETITIONER .31'' WkVMM^VT AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner of Health Andhra Pradesh, District, A.P. 3. The Director of Medical Education, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Hanumanpet, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District, A.P. 4. The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services Zonelll, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 5. Government General Hospital (G. G. H), Rep. by the Superintendent, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 6. P. Madhuri Latha, W/o. not known to the Petitioner, aged about 56 years, Occ Nursing Superintendent Grade-1 Hospital (G.G.H.), Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. Medical, Secretariat, Velagapudi, and Family Welfare, Government of 5‘^ Floor, API 1C Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur Government General ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the operation of interim order dated 24.06.2025 in W.P. No. 15299/2025, until disposal of the main Writ Appeal and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR SERVICES-I Counsel for the Respondent No.6: — The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT 1 APHC010422672025 ,r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] i 0 MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 956/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Between; 1. MARLAPTI SIVA RANJANI, W/O. DAVALA CHANDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/0. D.NO.54-2-938, SAIL NILAYAM, OPP. SIMS COLLEGE ROAD, 3RDLANE, PADMAVATHI GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. NAGAR, 2. GHANTA SHARMILA, D/0. G. KASI VISWANADHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0. D.NO.82-5-936, PARVATHIPURAM, LANE, OPP. TIRUPATHAMMA TEMPLE LANE, GUNTUR, DISTRICT, A.P. GUNTUR 3. EERAPANI DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. DASARI PENUMAKA ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.36-25-1483,14 LANE, SANJEEVAIAH NAGAR, DISTRICT, A.P. 4. NEAR CHURCH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR 4. MADASU MAHALAKSHMI, W/O. DEVARAPALLI RAVEENDRA, R/O. D. N0.11-232B, PATHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 5 5. . THALLURI LAKSHMI, W/O. MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 R/O. D.N0.26-44-97/1,4TH LANE, A.T. AGRAHARAM YEARS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 6. 6. PENNA MADHAVI LATHA, W/O. M. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O. D. NO. 16-5-213, LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 8. 8. RAYAPATI SARALA KUMARI, YEARS, R/0. FLAT NO.502, COLLEGE, REDDYPALEM district, A.P. 9 lane. A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR 11.BOPPUDI UMA DEVI W/O 56 YEARS NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, 12.KONDA SRILAKSHMI, W/O. M KISHORE RARI, ABOUT 49 YEARS R/0. D. NO °l929 2NDLANE, NEAR ARCH CENTRE GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. '“ro,No“3«™’ To S*"' ““ - "“K. OUKTOR.GOOTUR OISmCT ap: , WRAM, , A.P COLONY, GUNTUR, C/0. J. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 SRINIVASA NILAYAM, BESIDE ARKA ROAD DOWN, GUNTUR. GUNTUR GUNTUR, 10. , AGED NILAYAM, 5TH . GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 11. STANLEY RAJA KUMAR. AGED ABOUT D.NO.26-14-19, RAGHURAM NAGAR GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P R/0. REDDY, AGED RASOOL NAGAR, SARADA COLONY, GUNTUR, 13. 14.THUMMAPUDt MADHAVI. ABOUT 52 YEARS, TEMPLE LANE, DISTRICT, A.P. W/O. U. GIRI SRINIVASA RAO R/0. 1STLANE, ADITYA NAGAR REDDYPALEM ROAD . AGED SAI BABA PEDAKAKANI, GUNTUR ■■.APPELLANT(S) AND ' H*L?; ^oTTvToS? MEDICAL, DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, 3 VELAGAPUDl, AMARAVATI. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, 5TH FLOOR, APIIC GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, NT.R. DISTRICT, A.P. 4.THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, A.P. 5.THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES ZONEILL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. GOLLAPUDI, ...RESPONDENT(S): lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I WRIT APPEAL NO: 990/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent be pleased to set aside the impugned order passed in W.P. No. 15299/2025 dated 24.06.2025 which was passed without considering the Appellants plea to retain her in her original working place i.e.. Government General Hospital (G.G.H.), Guntur, Guntur District by suspending the transfer initiated by the Respondents in the Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department and direct the Respondents to retain the Appellant at Government General Hospital (G.G.H.), Guntur, Guntur District in her respective post and pass such Between: 1.CHILUVURI KIRANMAI, W/0. BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC NURSING SUPERINTENDENT GRADE-1, R/0 DNO2105’ NEAR POLERAMMA TEMPLE TEJA PUBLIC SCHOni ' GORANTIA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT a P ROAD, -APPELLANT AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL, . REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. DEPARTMENT 2.THE COMMISSIONER ‘ GOVERNMENTOF ANDHRA TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, OF HEALTH AND FAMILY PRADESH GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT N.T.R. district, A.P. WELFARE, FLOOR, API 1C 5TH medical, health and HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, 4, THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL ZONEIII, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AND HEALTH SERVICES .A.P. 5. GOVERNMENT GENERAL oMr^r-r. hospital G G H SUPERINTENDENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR REP. BY THE district, A.P. 6.P MADHURI LATHA, W/0 aged about 56 YEARS grade-1, NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER nursing SUPERINTENDENT GOVERNMENT GENERAL HOSPITAl n u x GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. (G.G.H.), ...RESPONDENT(S): jA NO: 1 OF 707^ may be pleased to dispense with filing passed in W.P. No. 15299/2025 High Court and pass such lA NO: 2 OF 9()9r may be pleased of Certified Copy of the interim order dated 24.06.2025 passed by this Hon’ble 5 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to CONDONE the delay of 24 days for filing the above Writ Appeal, in the interest of justice and equity and pass such I lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Stay the operation of interim order dated 24.06.2025 in W.P. No. 15299/2025, until disposal of the main Writ Appeal and pass such Counsel for the Appellant: 1.SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 6 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL Nos.956 AND 990 of 2025 COMMON JUDGMENT:rPer Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) These Writ Appeals are filed against by the common interim order, dated 24.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.14845 and 15299 of 2025. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned 2. Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. Brief facts of the case are that:- The appellants are working as Head Nurses/ Nursing Superintendent Grade-I and Grade-ll, initially appointed and posted at Mangalagiri, GGH, and later they have been deployed to work at GGH at Guntur. As per the appellants, they have not completed the threshold period of five (05) years as enumerated in transfer guidelines, therefore, their transfers are contrary to the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.344 Health, Medical and Family Welfare (B1) Department, dated 31.05.2025. At the stage of admission of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants submitted that the petitioners/appeltants may be given liberty to make application/representation to the respondents for consideration of their request on the grounds of spouse 7 and physically handicapped, which they could respondents in view of shortage of time, not bring to the notice of the as counseling was scheduled. Considering the request of the petitioners/appellants, they are permitted to make representation and on such representation, the 5*^ respondent i; directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.23 Finance (HR.1-PLG. & Policy) Department, dated 15.05.2025, r/w. G.O.Ms.No.344 Health, Medical and Family Welfare (B1) Department, dated 31.05.2025. Aggrieved by the said interim order IS passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, the present Writ Appeals have been filed. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the appellants had submitted representations as per the directions of the learned Single Judge. But, the said representations the official respondents, and the were not considered by appellants had not received communication from the respondents whether their any request had been considered or not. 5. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader the respondents would submit that the appearing for representations of the appellants have been considered and the request of the appellants has been rejected. But rejection of the representations of the appellants have been served on the appellants or not. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the there is no material placed before this Court to show that the case, as the main consideration and as no stay was granted by the learned Single Judge of this Court against the transfers Writ Petitions are pending before this Court for / 8 orders of the Appellants and they are discharging the duties at that place,, in our considered view it is appropriate and reasonable to request the learned Single Judge to hear and dispose of the Writ Petitions itself, in accordance with law, in the interest of justice, as expeditiously as possible. / f 6. Accordingly, these Writ Appeals are disposed of, requesting the learned Single Judge of this Court to hear and dispose of the Writ Petitions itself on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The PrI. Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Floor, APIIC Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, th Andhra Pradesh, 5 A.P. 3. The Director of Medical Education, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Hanumanpet, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District, A.P. Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Government of 4. The Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District, A.P. 5. The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services Zone-Ill, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 6. The Superintendent, Government General Hospital (G. G. H), Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. 7. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Narra, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Services-1, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:06/10/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT WA Nos. 956 AND 990 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEALS WITHOUT COSTS