- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54723 CRP No. 54 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 54 OF 2023 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI. C.M. ANANDAKUMARA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O CHIKKAMUNISWAMAPPA R/AT NO.136/1 (647), 6TH B MAIN ROAD. J.P. NAGAR 3RD PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 061. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. VIJAYA M D/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.27/2, 7TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, RT NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 028. 2. SMT. SHOBHA M D/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT 78/9, 1ST CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, YEDIYURA, JAYANAGARA BANGALORE - 560 070. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54723 CRP No. 54 of 2023 3. SMT. BHAGYA M D/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.3480, CHANDRANAGARA KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, JP NAGARA BANGALORE - 560 078. 4. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 5. SRI. VENKATESH M S/O LATE MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.3/4, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS GOWDANAPALYA, MANJUNATHANAGARA BANGALORE - 560 031. 6. SMT. M MEERA W/O BHUVANESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT SAMPATH STORES, T.R. NAGAR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 028. &RESPONDENTS (R2, R4 ABD R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023, NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; VIDE ORDER DATED 13.08.2024, NOTICE TO R6 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54723 CRP No. 54 of 2023 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.01.2023 PASSED ON IA.NO.II IN OS No.5034/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (c) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Proper steps are not taken for issue of notice to respondent No.1 who is the contesting respondent for the fourth time. Hence, revision petition against respondent No.1 needs to be dismissed consequently, revision petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5