IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 174 OF 2024 SHARIN MAHILA BACHAT GUT THR ITS PRESIDENT FARAKHAT KHATOON RAUF KHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS Mr. N. R. Pawade, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for the respondent/State Mr. E. P. Savant, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 4th APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. After hearing learned counsel for both sides, learned counsel for contesting respondent, on introductions, records consent for setting aside order impugned with liberty to relegate the matter back to the Minister for deciding the issue of limitation. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for contesting respondent, impugned order is set aside. Proceeding bearing No. VAIM-1123/Case No.211/Na.Pu.21 is relegated back to the Minister for deciding the issue of limitation in filing of the revision before the Deputy Commissioner (Supply), Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in proceeding No. 2023/SB/RP-41. It is clarified that the Minister is expected only to pass order on the issue of limitation as challenged 912.wp3779.22.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:10001 before him. In case the Minister holds that the delay is required to be condoned order be passed accordingly and the matter be relegated back to the Commissioner for decision on merit. Needless to say that if the contesting respondent fails to substantiate the delay, the appropriate order shall be passed in the revision. 3. Petition is disposed of. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 912.wp3779.22.odt 2 of 2