Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50808 (MAD)

Masiga @ Mashiha v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

CRL MP/9137/2025 · 2025-06-04

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 Masiga @ Mashiha ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its, The Inspector of Police, N2 Kasimedu Police Station, Chennai District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to relax the condition in para No.6(b) to report before the respondent police alternative days at 10.30 a.m. imposed in the order dated 23.01.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.Santhosh For Respondent : Mr.C.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 O R D E R This petition has been filed to relax the condition in para No.6(b) of the order dated 23.01.2025 made in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 by this Court directing the petitioner to report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m. 2.The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the petitioner filed a bail application in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 before this Court and this Court, by the order dated 23.01.2025, granted bail with certain conditions. One of the condition is that the petitioner to report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four months. The further contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the petitioner has got one year infant baby and she has to take care of her baby and also to attend her work. She is a daily wager, due to the condition imposed to appear before the respondent police on alternative days, she is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 unable to continue with her work and take care of her baby. Hence, prayed for relaxation of the condition. 3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is complying with the conditions imposed by this Court without any deviation. 4.Considering the submissions made on either side and finding that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions diligently, the condition imposed on the petitioner to report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m., is totally relaxed. All other conditions remain unaltered. 04.06.2025 rsi 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. rsi To 1.The Inspector of Police, N2 Kasimedu Police Station, Chennai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.M.P.No.9137 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.27945 of 2024 04.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis