APHC010531282023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27507/2023 Between: 1. P VISWANTHA REDDY, S/O. P. SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D/O. 4/44, NALLAPUREDDY PALLI VILLAGE, VALLUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA CITY, A.P. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, SPECIAL BRANCH, S.P. OFFICE, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SMT MANGADEVI, W/O.PANDURANGARAO KANTAMAI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. DOOR NO.8/3, 1109/A/2,PRANAN7A KESIDENCY, KESAVA NAGAR, YELLAREDDYGUDA, HYDERABAD, T.S. 5. MS KAVYA KANTAMANI, D/O. PANDURRANGARAO KANTAMANI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. DOOR NO.8/3, 1109/A/2, PRANAVA RESIDENCY, KESAVA NAGAR, YELLAREDDYGUDA, HYDERABAD, T.S. 6. SRI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. PERSONAL ASSISTANT OF DHUSHANTA REDDY, R/O. PRODDATUR TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in writ of may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering the civil transactions of the petitioner and respondent nos. 4 and 5 and consequently direct the 3th respondent not to call the petitioner to Police Station and not to harass the petitioner in any manner during the pendency of the main writ petition and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Vith respondent not to call the petitioner to Police Station and not to harass the petitioner in any manner, during the pendency of the main writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY Y Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27507/2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “… to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in writ of may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering the civil transactions of the petitioner and respondent nos. 4 and 5 and consequently direct the 3th respondent not to call the petitioner to Police Station and not to harass the petitioner in any manner during the pendency of the main writ petition and pass such.…” 2. Heard Sri Y.Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes. 4. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on the complaint made by unofficial respondents, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. He would further submit that no crime has been registered against the petitioner and as the subject matter is civil in nature, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 300 WRIT PETITION NO: 27507/2023 Date: 08.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 27507/2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 08.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV