APHC010041272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2465/2020 Between: 1. D. RAMBABU, S/O BHASKAR RAO @ BASHA AGE- 36 YEARS, OCC- GOVT. SERVICE R/O 301, CHALASANI RESIDENCY, SATRAMPADU, TELECOM NAGAR, 15 LANE, ELURU CITY, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A. P. POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 5. SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINTHALAPUDI PS, CHINTHALAPUDI WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2465 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 6th respondent in registering FIR No- 51/2020 as against the petitioner, G. 0. No- 17 dated 03.01.2020 issued by 1st Respondent and consequential Memo in No- 14/SDO-J/ Gent/2020, dt- 24.01.2020 issued by the 5th respondent, are illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14 and 20 of constitution of India and consequently quash the same and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri N. Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the memo of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jangareddigudem, a case in Cr.No.51 of 2020 was registered. During the course of investigation, the aforementioned crime was referred as Further Action Drop (AD). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the submission, the writ petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2465 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 228