BARPOOR SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/12922/2025 · 2025-07-23
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50798 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50798 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Bharpoor Singh
State of Haryana and
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
The the respondents to re increment in their last year of retirement.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent no. their representation
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that representation, dated Secondary Education, dated 24.04.2025, passed in CWP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12922-2025
Date of Decision :23.07.2025
arpoor Singh and Others
Versus of Haryana and Others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to re-fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual increment in their last year of retirement.
Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, will be satisfied in case respondent no. their representation, dated 30.11.2024, Annexure P Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that , dated 30.11.2024, will be decided by Education, in view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment dated 24.04.2025, passed in CWP-14627-2024 and other connected cases titled IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 2025 Date of Decision :23.07.2025
…Petitioners
….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, will be satisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to decide 2024, Annexure P-3, in a specified period. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending decided by respondent no.3/Director, view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment 2024 and other connected cases titled
directing fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, is directed to decide , the pending , view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment
PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.07.24 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-12922-2025
Mahabir Singh Tanwar
order within three months
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
7.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of
July 23, 2025 ps
2025
-2- Mahabir Singh Tanwar v. State of Haryana and within three months. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the fficer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioners.
Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
State of Haryana and others, by passing a speaking In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the 50,000 to the petitioners.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
by passing a speaking In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.07.24 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document