Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50798 (PNJ)

BARPOOR SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/12922/2025 · 2025-07-23

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

106/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Bharpoor Singh State of Haryana and CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to re increment in their last year of retirement. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent no. their representation 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that representation, dated Secondary Education, dated 24.04.2025, passed in CWP IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12922-2025 Date of Decision :23.07.2025 arpoor Singh and Others Versus of Haryana and Others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to re-fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual increment in their last year of retirement. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, will be satisfied in case respondent no. their representation, dated 30.11.2024, Annexure P Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that , dated 30.11.2024, will be decided by Education, in view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment dated 24.04.2025, passed in CWP-14627-2024 and other connected cases titled IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 2025 Date of Decision :23.07.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, will be satisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to decide 2024, Annexure P-3, in a specified period. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending decided by respondent no.3/Director, view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment 2024 and other connected cases titled directing fix the petitioners’ pension by granting them annual submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, is directed to decide , the pending , view of law laid down by this Court vide judgment PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.07.24 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12922-2025 Mahabir Singh Tanwar order within three months 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of July 23, 2025 ps 2025 -2- Mahabir Singh Tanwar v. State of Haryana and within three months. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the fficer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioners. Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable State of Haryana and others, by passing a speaking In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the 50,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No by passing a speaking In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.07.24 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document