BOMMAREDDY SRI HARI PARASD REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/19786/2025 · 2025-11-27
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50796 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50796 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010391862025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19786/2025 Between: Bommareddy Sri Hari Parasd Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KUNTAMUKKALA SAI SREE SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
4. S PRANATHI The Court made the following order:
The short grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent authorities are not taking any action against the unauthorized layout made by the 4th respondent in R.S.No.128/1A & 128/B situated in Mylavaram village and
mandal, by encroaching the petitioners property situated in R.S.No.128, without obtaining due permissions and without leaving any setbacks.
2. Heard Sri K.S.S.Sanjay, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt S.Pranathi, learned Standing counsel for APCRDA.
3. Smt S.Pranathi, learned Standing counsel for APCRDA on written instructions dated 19.09.2025 submitted that the subject layout was taken up without approval and statutory action has been initiated under Section 115 of APCRDA Act by way of issuing Provisional Order (04-12-2024) and Confirmation Order(19-12-2024) and a communication was also sent to the District Registrar to halt further registrations/transactions and they would further take steps in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above submissions, as the authorities have already set the law into motion, there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petitioner is liable to be closed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS