Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:50394
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1654 of 2023 Kamal Singhal, S/o. Late M.C. Singhal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o. Deori Khurd, Police Station Torwa, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 2/ Owner Of The Motorcycle No. C.G. 10 E J 8159)
... Appellant versus 1 – Baratu, S/o. Sampat Ram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o. Village Dongri (Kathapali) Tehsil And P/S Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Claimant / Father) 2 - Radha Bai, W/o. Baratu, Aged About 44 Years, R/o. Village Dongri (Kathapali) Tehsil And P/S Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Claimant / Mother) 3 - Manish Kumar, S/o. Baratu, Aged About 20 Years, R/o. Village Dongri (Kathapali) Tehsil And P/S Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Claimant / Brother) 4 – Neelam, D/o. Baratu, Aged About 16 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Baratu Sahu, R/o. Village Dongri (Kathapali) ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2025.10.09 16:58:21 +0530
2 Tehsil And P/S Baloda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Claimant / Sister) 5 - Shatrughan Surywanshi, S/o. Ramfal Suryavanshi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o. Village Matiyari, P/S Seepat, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 1/ Driver Of The Motorcycle No.
C.G. 10 E J 8159) 6 - Narmada Prasad, S/o. Atmaram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o. Village Dongri (Kathapali) Tehsil And P/S Baloda, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 3/ Then And Their Owner Of The Motorcycle No. C.G. 11 C F 0354) 7 - Shani Kumar Baghel, S/o. Ramprasad Baghel, R/o. Village Bana, P/S And Tehsil- Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 4/ Registered Owner Of The Motorcycle No. C.G. 11 C F 0354)
... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Yash Yadav, Advocate
(Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judgment on Board 09.10.2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal filed under
3 Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the dispute has been settled amicably between the parties.
2. In view of the above submission, this appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok
Judge