1 2025:CGHC:49518-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 713 of 2025 Divya Gautam D/o Late Shri S.P. Gautam Aged About 41 Years R/o- Aganpur, Chitrakot Road, Infront Of Pollution Conrol Board, P.O. Dharampur,a Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster C.G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, C.G. 2. High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee Through Its President Cum Secretary, Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Tribal Research And Training Institute, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector- 4, Raipur, C.G. 3. Commissioner Cum Member Secretary Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Tribal Research And Training Institute, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector- 4, Raipur, C.G. 4. Secretary Department Of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, C.G. 5. Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Department Of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, C.G. 6. Divisional Forest Officer South Forest Division, Kondagaon, District Bastar, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Kishore Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.07 14:47:06 +0530 2 Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Addl. A.G. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 06/10/2025 1. Heard Mr. Kishore Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Addl. A.G. for the respondents/ State. 2. The appellant has filed this appeal praying for following prayer:- “(i) Set aside the part of the order dated 02/07/2024 (as contained in para 17) passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 7013 of 2011 (Annexure P/1) whereby the Hon'ble Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court has remitted the matter back to the High-Power Caste Scrutiny Committee and hold that the social security certificate issued to the appellant is valid. (ii) To grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and appropriate to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. After arguing at length, learned Senior counsel seeks permission of this court to withdraw the instant writ appeal with liberty to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum. 3 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copies of the documents, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti