Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50784 (ALL)

HARINDRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.

ABAIL/19979/2021 · 2025-09-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19979 of 2021 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State are present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 40-A of 2006, under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 218, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 13(2) P.C. Act, Police Station Nagara, District Ballia with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA submits, however, instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2021 but the same has become infructuous as applicant has already died on 29.08.2023. He produced the death certificate of the applicant during the course of argument, which is taken on record and marked as 'A'. 4. Learned counsel for applicant also submits, as applicant has already died, therefore, instant application may be dismissed as infructuous. 5. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. September 8, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Harindra Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad