APHC010570312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4732/2024 Between: 1. S TIRUMALA RAO, S/O. RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGE 41 YEARS, OCC . WORKING IN GOSALA OF SRIKALAHASTHISWARA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 2. D.SRAVAN KUMAR,, S/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGE 36 YEARS, OCC . WORKING IN GOSALA OF SRIKALAHASTHISWARA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 3. D.MUNI SHANKAR,, S/O. VENKATA MUNI REDDY, AGE 31 YEARS, OCC . WORKING IN GOSALA OF SRIKALAHASTHISWARA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 2. SRI K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT GOLLAPUDI VIJAYAWADA R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 05 03 2025 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2025 IN CC NO 4732 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 HBKMJ & HVN,J C.C.No.4732 of 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful violation, flouting and disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in WP 23010/2023 dated 27.02.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent No’s. 2 as party respondent No. 2 in the contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. . 3 HBKMJ & HVN,J C.C.No.4732 of 2024 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with and as such no cause survives in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 14.11.2025 PGT