Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50779 (KAR)

SHARANAPPA @ SHARANAGOUDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/200073/2024 · 2025-06-04

Suraj Govindaraj

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 200073 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.201508 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SHARANAPPA @ SHARANAGOUDA S/O ANAVIRAPPA BIRADAR AGE:54 YEARS KALABURAGI 2. VEERANTHAIAH S/O BASALINGAIAH SALIMATA AGE : 64 YEARS KALABURAGI 3. DHULAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA YADGIRA AGE: 73 YEARS KALABURAGI 4. SIDDAPPA S/O DHULAPPA YADGIRA AGE:51 YEARS KALABURAGI 5. SANGANNA S/O LATE SHIDRAMAPPA ALLOLLI AGE:65 YEARS KALABURAGI Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 6. BASAVARAJ S/O LATE SHARANAPPA AGE:31 YEARS KALABURAGI 7. PRAKASH S/O SHARANAGOUDA AGE:26 YEARS KALABURAGI 8. SIDDANNA S/O IRANNA AGE: 54 YEARS KALABURAGI 9. RATHNAMMA W/O KALLAPPA YADAGIRA AGE: 70 YEARS KALABURAGI 10. ANNARAO S/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGE :65 YEARS KALABURAGI 11. IRAPPA @ IRANNA S/O BHIMARAYA AGE :38 YEARS KALABURAGI 12. SUSHEELA BAI W/O SHANKARLAL AGE:73 YEARS KALABURAGI 13. BASANAGOUDA S/O ANAVEERAPPA BIRADAR AGE :59 YEARS KALABURAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 14. SANGANGOUDA S/O ANAVEERAPPA BIRADAR AGE:56 YEARS KALABURAGI 15. NAGANNAGOUDA S/O ANNEPPAGOUDA AGE: 43 YEARS KALABURAGI 16. NAGAPPA S/O THIPPANNA NATIKARA AGE: 41 YEARS KALABURAGI 17. SHANTHAVEERAPPA S/O ANAVEERAPPA ALLOLI AGE:63 YEARS KALABURAGI 18. SHARANABASAPPA S/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH AGE:40 YEARS KALABURAGI 19. ASHOK S/O SHANKAR AGE:30 YEARS KALABURAGI 20. SHANKAR S/O KHEMU RATHOD AGE: 55 YEARS KALABURAGI 21. SHARNAMMA W/O TIPPANNA AGE:67 YEARS KALABURAGI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 22. TARABAI W/O MAREPPA AGE:51 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF INGALAGI VILLAGE TQ: CHITTAPUR DIST:KALABURAGI-583 102 &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHAITANYAKUMAR CHANDRIKI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALURU-560 001 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.4/2, 2ND FLOOR R.P.BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN BENGLAURU-560 001 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD KALABURAGI-585 102 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KALABURAGI TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI -585 102 5. THE VICE PRESIDENT THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT CO. LTD - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 WADICEMENT WORKS, WADI TQ:CHITTAPUR, DIST:KALABURAGI-585 102 &RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ARATI PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 & R4; SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; NOTICE TO R5 -SERVED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED U/O. 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 26.07.2023 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP NO.201508/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO FIX THE TIME FRAME IN THE ORDER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) The petitioners are before this Court seeking following reliefs: "Wherefore it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow the above Review Petition and review the order dated 26.07.2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.201508/2019 vide Annexure-A and - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2848 RP No. 200073 of 2024 consequently be pleased to fix the time frame in the order in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Sri.Chaitanya Kumar Chandriki, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the only aspect the petitioner wishes this Court to direct is fixing the time frame for passing of the award by respondent No.3. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submit that said respondents have challenged the order in W.P.No.201508/2019 out of which present review petition arises in W.A.No.200123/2024 wherein notice has been ordered on 07.02.2025. If that be the case it is for the petitioners to make submissions in the said appeal. As no order could be passed in the review petition, the same stands disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SBN List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1