APHC010041102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2204/2025 Between: C. Muniratnam ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 O R D E R: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent no.2 to 4 in not disposing of the application filed by the petitioner herein for taking action against the Respondent no.6 to 8 not allowing the Petitioners to enter into the land even though they are rightful owners of the property in relation to the land in Sy.No.135/2C an extent of Ac 0.80 cents, Sy.No.135/2A1 an extent of Ac.0.25 cents and Sy.No.135/2D an extent of Ac.1.30 cents, bearing Patta No.134 situated at Balla, Raamakuppam, Madanapalli, Chittoor is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A and consequently pleased to direct respondent No. 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16-12-2024 and pass…..” 2. Heard Mr.K.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the scheduled property to an extent of Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.135/2C, to an extent of Ac.0.25 cents in Sy.No.135/2A1 and to an extent of Ac.1.30 cents in Sy.No.135/2D bearing patta No.134 situated at Balla, Raamakuppam, Madanapalli, Chittoor District. The said 3 properties devolved upon the petitioner from his ancestors and the revenue authorities also issued pattadar passbook and mutated his name in the revenue records. Subsequently, revenue authorities also issued possession certificate in favour of the petitioner and since then the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the property without any interruption. 4. The Revenue Department has made necessary updates and changes to the official land ownership and cultivation records and in that records also the petitioner’s name was shown in 1-B adangal. However, the unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 unlawfully interfered with the petitioner’s property and they are obstructing the petitioner from proceeding with construction activity. 5. In view of the same, the petitioner made representations on 16.12.2024 and 17.12.2024 to the 4th respondent/S.H.O. but they did not take any action thereupon. Therefore, the petitioner approached this Court by way of this Writ Petition. 6. Today, when the matter is came up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home furnished a copy of F.I.R.No.10 of 2025, dated 31.01.2025, which is registered in 4 pursuance of the report made by the petitioner on 16.12.2024 under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the SCs & STs (POA) Act. 7. In view of the fact that the F.I.R was already registered pursuant to the report filed by the petitioner, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 31.01.2025 Pmk 5 138 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No:2204 OF 2025 Date:31.01.2025 Pmk