Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50769 (AP)

M VENKATA SESHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28878/2025 · 2025-11-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010558212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28878/2025 Between: 1. M VENKATA SESHA REDDY, M. VENKATA SESHA REDDY, S/O. AYYAPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O.BRAHMANAKRAKA VILLAGE, JALADANKI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, JALADANKI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, JALADANKI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, JALADANKI P.S,NELLOER DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities in considering and acting upon the petitioners representation dated 24.09.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 24.09.2025 under the applicable laws and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to duly consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 24.09.2025, within a time frame as may 2 be stipulated by this Honble Court pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to be impleaded as parties/proposed Respondents Nos.7 & 8 in W.P. No. 28878 of 2025 and also in any pending Interlocutory Applications therein, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit us to be impleaded as Parties/Proposed Respondent Nos.7 to 9 in W.P. No. 28878 of 2025 and also in any pending Interlocutory Applications therein, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISTAM SAKTHI NIRANJAN GUPTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner, seeking the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities in considering and acting upon the petitioners representation dated 24.09.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 24.09.2025 under the applicable laws and pass ...” Heard Sri Sakthi Niranjan Gupta, learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner requested for a direction to respondent Police to consider the Petitioner’s representation dated 24.09.2025 and take appropriate steps on the subject matter and pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions, would submit that respondent Police did not take any action on the Petitioner’s representation since the subject is purely civil in nature and civil suits are pending before the competent Civil Court and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before competent Civil Court where the suit is pending, 4 according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28878 of 2025 05.11.2025 Mjl /*