IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1363 Sudesh Vikas and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Ms. Shefali Bania, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Partap, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Ms. Simran Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for Mr. Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 12. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition list dated 13.06.2011, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that even otherwise they stand retired during the pendency of the present petition, however, prays liberty to get the matter revived, in case 3. Disposed of 27.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12896 Date of decision: Sudesh Vikas and another Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Shefali Bania, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Partap, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Ms. Simran Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for respondent No.11 Mr. Kunal Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 12. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition list dated 13.06.2011, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that even otherwise they stand retired during the pendency of the present petition, however, prays liberty to get the matter revived, in case need arises. Disposed of accordingly. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 12896-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Arjun Partap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. respondent No.11. Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, Advocate Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the final seniority list dated 13.06.2011, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that even otherwise they stand retired during the pendency of the present petition, however, prays need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for quashing the final seniority Learned counsel for the petitioners states that even otherwise they stand retired during the pendency of the present petition, however, prays for ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.27 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document