Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50763 (AP)

Mucherla Thrimurthulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13572/2024 · 2025-10-30

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272452024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13572/2024 Between: 1. MUCHERLA THRIMURTHULU, S/O M. PEDA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER (HINDI), APSWRS/JR COLLEGE A MALLAVARAM, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE H R IV F R AND L R DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT A P. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETAIY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND VICE CHAIRMAN A P S W R E I SOCIETY, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRACT A P. 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION INSTITUTION SOCIETY, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT A P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents, in not 2 extending the age of superannuation of the petitioner from 60 years to 62 years even though the government had issued GO.Ms.No.l5, dated 31.01.2022 is Illegal , violation of principals of Natural justice and contrary to Service Rules and also Art 14,16,21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to extend the age of superannuation of the petitioner from 60 years to 62 years with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly to continue the petitioner pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent No.4 / The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department as the respondent No.4 to the Writ Petition in 13572 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.13572 of 2024, dated 16-07-2024 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V L MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NOOKA JAGANNADHAM 2. GP FOR SERVICES III 3. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.13572 of 2024 ORDER: Sri G.V.L.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 27.10.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present petition. 2. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY,J Date: 31.10.2025 SNI 4 65 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13572/2024 DATE: 31.10.2025 SNI