1 2025:CGHC:22321 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 444 of 2025 • Maa Mahamaya Explosive A Proprietor Ship Firm Through Its Sole Proprietor Sandeep Kumar, S/o Late Satanand Sharma, Aged 40 Years, Sole Proprietor Of Maa Mahamaya Exposive, R/o Kulwant Niwas, Old Rto Office Gali, Bauripara, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Unionof India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Commerce And Industry, Vanijya Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Chief Controller Of Explosive Petroleum And Explosives Safety Organisation (Peso), 5th Floor, A-Block, Cgo Complex, Seminary Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra 3. Deputy Chief Controller Of Explosive Petroleum And Explosives Safety Organisation (Peco), 5th Floor, A-Block, Cgo Complex, Seminary Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra. 4. Collector Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 5. Assistant Director Town And Country Planning, Old Employment Office, Ring Road, Namanakala, Ambikapur, District- Surguja C.G. 6. Regional Office C.G. Environment Conservation Board, Girls Premises Road, Near Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Namanakala, Ambikapur, District- Surguja C.G. 7. Superintendent Of Police Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 8. Forest Division Officer Balrampur Forest Division, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 2 9. Sub- Divisional Officer (R) Rajpur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. 10. Tahsildar Rajpur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Annu Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Union of India : Ms. Swati Rai, CGC on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. For State ; Mr. Satish Guupta, Govt. Advocate. For private respondents : Mr. Hrishabh Deo Shukla, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Advocate. For intervener : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 22/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if exigency so arises. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.05.22 15:49:55 +0530