1 2025:CGHC:50040-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 253 of 2022 1 - Vijay Sharma S/o Shri Ratanlal Sharma Aged About 48 Years R/o Behind Bus Stand , Near Rewabandh Talab , Ward No. 27, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kailash Chandravanshi S/o Shri Komar Chandravanshi Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. 27, Kotwarpara, Atal Chowk, Village Kanjheta, Kolhegaon, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer , Police Station Kawardha (Kabirdham ) District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 2 - Arun Kumar Meshram S/o Shyam Das Meshram Aged About 49 Years District Food Officer, Kawardha, Posted At Collectrorate , Kawardha , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.10.09 10:34:10 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 08.10.2025 1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this present petition when the case was called out for hearing. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 / State as well as Mr. Yogendra Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: “a. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Special Criminal Case No.874/2021 "State of Chhattisgarh Vs Vijay Sharma and another" pending before the learned Special Judge under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Kawardha, District - Kabirdham (C.G.). b. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an order restraining the special judge in further proceeding of the case as the proceeding in the case is abuse of process of law as the entire case is based on unauthorized investigation and influence of ruling party of the state. c. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an order whereby the police authorities / State may kindly be directed to pay each of the applicants a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- as compensation for mental harassment by lodging 3 the FIR with malafide intention and investigation without having any authority under the law.” 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that he has no instruction in the matter. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 / State submits that the matter has become infructuous as the petitioner has already been acquitted on 28.03.2024. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the State, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet