Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50754 (AP)

PADI JAYASHANKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25934/2024 · 2025-11-16

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010501352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 25934/2024 Between: 1. PADI JAYASHANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE KRISHNA REDDY, R/O D.NO.3-89, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUCHANURU, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2. SIRINIVASAM MUTUALLY AIDED COOP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY,, OFFICE AT AVILALA, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDALAM, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT G.GIRIDHAR MURARI, S/O G. ADINARAYANAMMA, R/O PLOT NO 55, GOLLAPALLI ROAD, THUMMALAGUNTA VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATHI. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE CHITTOR DISTRICT) 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI DIVISION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, 2 (ERSTWHILE CHITTOR) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interefering with the possession of the petitioners over the land an extent of Ac. 01.33 CTS in R.S.No. 103/6 and an extent of Ac. 02.74 cts in R.S.No. 104/lA, totalling Ac. 04.07 cts, situated in Kothapalyem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the G.O.Ms. No. 596 Dt. 19.12.2023 and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents to not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the lands an extent of Ac. 01.33 cts in R.S. No. 103/6 and an extent of Ac. 02.74 cts. in R.S.No. 104/lA, totalling Ac. 04.07 cts, situated in Kothapalyem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District pending consideration before 3rd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the lands an extent of Ac. 01.33 cts in R.S. No. 103/6 and an extent of Ac. 02.74 cts. in R.S.No, 104/lA, totalling Ac. 04.07 cts, situated in Kothapalyem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District pending disposal of the case pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri K.M. Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 17th November, 2025 cbn 4 162 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH Writ Petition No.25934 of 2024 17th November, 2025 cbn