Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67658 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1644 of 2025 Petitioner :- Veerpal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyan Prakash Tiwari,Kamlesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1.Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2.The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No.2 to decide the Revision No.1246 of 2024, computerized No.202454121300001246 (Veerpal Singh Vs. Collector Singh and others) under Section 48(1) CH. Act within stipulated period as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court, Annexure No.3 to this writ petition). (II). Issue a writ, order or direction ion the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to sell the plots No.519/2, area 0.614 Hectare Gata No.523/1 Rakba 0.192 hectare and Gata No.875, area 0.588 hectare, total 3 Gata and total rea 1.394 hectare situated at village-Banjriya, Pargana- Chaumahala, Tehsil-Bahedi, District-Bareilly, during pendency of Revision No.1246 computerized No.202454121300001246 (Veerpal Singh Vs. Collector Singh and others) under Section 48(1) CH. Act." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that time barred chak revision filed at the instance of the petitioner is pending before respondent No.2/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly since 23.10.2024. He submitted that there was delay of 1/1-2 month in filing the chak revision. He submitted that notice has been issued to the opposite parties on 21.03.2024. He submitted that proper direction be issued for expeditiously disposal of pending chak revision. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. There is no dispute about the fact that time barred chak revision filed by the petitioner is pending before respondent No.2. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No2/ Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly to consider and decide the aforementioned pending revision considering the delay condonation matter first in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 PS* Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad