Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50738 (AP)

M NAGA VENKATESWARA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17691/2024 · 2025-12-21

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010347322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 17691/2024 Between: 1. M NAGA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SURYA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.D.NO.1-312, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, RAVULAPALEM, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER R AND B DEPARTMENT, MANAGING DIRECTOR, APRDC, 5TH FLOOR, R AND B HEAD OFFICE IN STATE BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEERR AND B, R AND B CIRCLE, ELURU , ELURU DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri D. Rama Koteswara Rao, learned Counsel representing Sri Annamneedi Balakrishna, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings. 2. Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer (R&B), dated 22.12.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the bills have been paid and no amount is pending. 4. When this matter was called out in the morning, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner sought pass over to obtain instructions. When the matter is called out now, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions from his Client, submits that the amounts have been paid and no further consideration in this Writ Petition is necessary. 5. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 22.12.2025 DSV 34 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 17691/2024 22.12.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 17691/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 5. 22.12.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV