Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 5073 (RAJ)
TEJRAM S/O SHRI RAGHUNATH v. BHAGWAN DAS S/O SHRI RADHEY SHYAM
CR/34/2025 · 2025-09-15
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 34/2025
1. Tejram S/o Shri Raghunath, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.). 2. Daulat Ram S/o Shri Tejram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.). 3. Smt. Mishro W/o Shri Todarmal Saini D/o Late Shri Lalaram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Randaka Baas, Gram Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.). 4. Smt. Saroj W/o Shri Daulat Ram D/o Late Shri Lalaram Mali, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Randaka Baas, Gram Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. Bhagwan Das S/o Shri Radhey Shyam, Aged About 52 Years, Shopkeeper Tenant-In Front Of Chhaju Singh Ki Gali, Baal Niketan Bhawan, Malakheda Darwaje Bahar, Alwar City, Alwar (Raj.). 2. Nagar Nigam, Alwar Through Commissioner Nagar Nigam Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Vikram Yadav, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 15/09/2025 ;kphXk.k dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku fdjk;k vf/kdj.k] vyoj }kjk vthZ la[;k 34@46@24 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-10-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls ;kphx.k dk vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph rFkk v;kph i{k dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA ;kph i{k dh vksj ls vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr vkosnu is'k dj ;g vkifRr yh fd oknxzLr lEifRr ds laca/k esa iwoZ esa
[2025:RJ-JP:37337] (2 of 2) [CR-34/2025] izLrqr okn la[;k 48@2018 okfil fy;s tkus ls fu.khZr gks pqdk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj ;g i'pkrorhZ vthZ ¼vkosnu½ pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA v;kph dh vksj ls okn dkj.k o okn dh fo"k; oLrq vkfn vyx gksuk crkrs gq, vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k] ftl ij vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;kph i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors.
(2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;s tkus ls Li"V gS fd ek= vthZ ¼vkosnu½ esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuksa ds vk/kkj ij vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA ;kph dh vksj ls tks vkifRr;ka yh x;h gSa] os rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u gaS rFkk fy;s x;s vk{ksi@vkifRr;ka vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSaA mijksDr foospu ls Li"V gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] mlesa dksbZ vfu;ferrk ;k voS/kkfudrk ugha gSA ifj.kker% ;kph@izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-10-2024 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh blh vuqlkj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /28