1 2025:CGHC:48884 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5961 of 2021 Devaram Markam S/o Shri Hiram Markam Aged About 38 Years Teacher (Lb), Primary School, Lohndipara, Block Sukma, District Sukma (C.G.), District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Managing Director State Project Office, Samagra Shiksha, Chhattisgarh, Raipur 2nd Floor, Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The District Collector District Sukma, The Ex-Officio District Director Of The Samagra Shiksha Mission, District Sukma District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The District Education Officer District Sukma (C.G.), District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Rajendra Prasad Sinfra Teacher L.B. Govt. M.S. Durkaguda, District Sukma District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Chaubey, Advocate For Res/State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 23.09.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief(s):- 2 “10.1. That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue the appropriate writs, order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent authority and set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 16.07.2021(Annexure-P/1) passed by the respondent No. 3, by declaring the same is bad in law. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly also quash the order dated 16.04.2021(Annexure-P/7) issued by the respondent No. 3 and consequently may kindly direct the respondent authority to consider the case of the petitioner for the sankul Coordinator at Kotra Sankul Central as per the guideline issued by the higher authority. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow any other relief as the Hon’ble Court may be deemed fit and proper. 10.4 May kindly be pleased to allow the Cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioner was recommended for appointment on the post of Sankul Coordinator but he was not considered to appoint on such post whereas one Mr. P. R. Mandavi, has been appointed at Government Higher Secondary School, Burdi, Block Kotra, Sukma vide impugned order dated16.07.2021 (Annexure P/1). He further submits that the competent authority i.e. Principal of the same school, recommended the name of the petitioner for such appointment but the same has not been given to the petitioner, therefore, the order (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No. 3 is bad in law which may be quashed. 3. Per contra, learned counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that though the recommendation made by the Principal of the same school was in the name of the petitioner however, it was found that some complaint was made against the name of the petitioner, therefore, his name was not considered for appointment on the post of Sankul Coordinator. 3 4. Be that as it may, this Court is inclined to disposed of this writ petition permitting the petitioner to submit a representation with regard to grievance projected in this writ petition to respondent No. 3 who in turn shall take decision on the representation so filed by the petitioner within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of the representation after hearing the petitioner and respondent No. 4. 5. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and if any adverse order would be passed against the petitioner, he may be approach this Court. 6. With the aforesaid observations & directions, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge ami AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2025.09.29 13:25:20 +0530