Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73398-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13301 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Additional District Magistrate (Finance And Revenue) And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anadi Krishna Narayana,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Sudeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Sri Manish Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is praying for a direction upon the Bank of Baroda to complete the process of providing vacant de facto physical possession to the petitioner. 4. It appears from the record that physical possession was handed over to the petitioner on December 24, 2020 and a sale certificate was executed in favour of the petitioner on January 12, 2021. Subsequently, after a period of after twenty months, the petitioner by letter dated December 27, 2022 has written a complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli wherein he has stated as follows :- "1- बबक आफ बडड़ौददा जजोनल आफफस वदारदाणससी ददारदा ममुझझे सझेल सफररफफकझे र भसी फदनदानाँक 16.03.2020 कजो पदाप्त हहआ। 2- बबक आफ बडड़ौददा ददारदा उक्त सम्पतत्ति ककी रतजस्रटसी भसी फदनदानाँक 12.1.2021 कजो कर दसी गयसी। 3- बबक आफ बडड़ौददा ददारदा ममुझझे फदनदानाँक 24.12.2020 कजो उक्त सम्पतत्ति पर कब्जदा भसी फदयदा। 4- तहससीलददार चफकयदा ददारदा उक्त सम्पतत्ति पर फदनदानाँक 06.08.2021 कजो ददातखिल खिदाररज फकयदा गयदा तजसकदा वदाद ससंख्यदा 00118/2021 हहै। 5- मझेरझे जमसीन पर कमु छ लजोग कब्जदा करनदा चदाहतझे हब और कर भसी रहझे हब। अगल बगल कझे लजोग मझेरझे सम्पतत्ति पर खिझेतसी कर रहझे हहै व उसझे अपनदा बतदा रहझे हहै। मझेरझे सम्पतत्ति पर हमझे जदानझे व उसकजो बनवदानझे सझे भसी रजोक रहझे हब। अततः शसीमदान सझे फवनम्र फनवझेदन हहै फक उफचत कदायरवदाहसी करझे तदाफक मब अपनझे जमसीन कजो बनवदा कर वहदासं रह सकक । क्ययोंफक वहदासं जदानझे पर ममुझझे मझेरझे जदान मदाल कजो खितरदा हहै। " 5. Upon a perusal of paragraph no.3 of the said complaint, it is clear that there is an admission on behalf of the petitioner that possession of the property was handed over to him. Furthermore, it is clear that a sale certificate has also been issued in favour of the petitioner. 6. In light of the same, the allegation made by the petitioner that physical possession of the vacant property was not handed over to the petitioner appears to be an allegation without any basis. 7. Since, there are disputed question of facts, we do not wish to decide the same on merits. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad